{"id":281,"date":"2025-04-05T08:00:58","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T01:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/?p=281"},"modified":"2025-04-05T08:00:58","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T01:00:58","slug":"taxation-cluster-job-creation-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/taxation-cluster-job-creation-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\">pro-visioner.com  <\/a>&#8211; Testing the Efficacy of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law ,  The controversy over the Job Creation Bill, which people call the omnibus law, is over. The drama behind the passing of this law has become its own color. Pros and cons have emerged from experts in law, economics, state administration, and other components of society. Demonstrations have erupted everywhere, adding to the excitement of this law. However, this time, the author will only focus on the strategy and purpose of the government in issuing this regulation in order to add insight to the loyal readers of Tax Magazine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is worth mentioning that this taxation cluster does not substantially replace the old taxation laws, namely KUP Law, Income Tax Law, and VAT and STLG Law, but only amends several articles in those laws. Why is it changed and not replaced? Because according to the policy makers in this country, both in the legislature and the executive, the focus of the taxation law is still relevant to be used today, so it is enough to change a few important articles that are adjusted to its main house, namely Job Creation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the name implies, the Job Creation Law aims to combine many laws or regulations in order to create an investment climate that is friendly to investors, aka creating ease of doing business. The hope is that once this main goal is achieved, a series of other goals will emerge, namely creating new jobs, driving economic growth, and most importantly securing state revenue in the taxation sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From the above explanation, the author will convey that the taxation cluster is expected to contribute reliable state revenue in the field of taxation, through (1) increasing the number of investments, (2) voluntary compliance, (3) providing legal certainty, and (4) creating fairness in the business climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These four main objectives are the reasons why the taxation cluster is included in the Job Creation Law. Now, in the first part of this edition, the author will try to test the reliability of the Taxation Cluster of Job Creation Law on the first objective, namely increasing the amount of investment in this country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"480\" src=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Taxation-Cluster-Job-Creation-Law.jpg\" alt=\"Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law\" class=\"wp-image-282\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Taxation-Cluster-Job-Creation-Law.jpg 800w, https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Taxation-Cluster-Job-Creation-Law-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Taxation-Cluster-Job-Creation-Law-768x461.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>2021 economic projection<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at the outlook for the Indonesian economy in 2021 compiled by the coordinating ministry for the economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Indonesia&#8217;s economy, according to the projections of three international institutions, namely the OECD, World Bank and IMF, is in the top three in the world as a country that will increase its GDP (gross domestic product) in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is also other data that shows this optimism with the rebound of the household consumption index in the third quarter (Q3) of 2020, which had contracted, causing Indonesia to enter the brink of recession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The name is also a projection, of course it cannot be ensured that the final result is 100 percent accurate. It still has to be proven by the policies that accompany it. One of the policies that is awaited and used as a game changer in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak is the discovery of the anti-Covid-19 vaccine which is planned to be given en masse and free of charge to all Indonesian citizens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The amended tax regulations in the Job Creation Law can be seen in Articles 111, 112 and 113 of this law which mention seven policies to increase investment, namely:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A gradual reduction in the Corporate Income Tax rate of 22 percent (2020 and 2021) and 20 percent (2022 onwards).<br>A reduction in the corporate income tax rate for taxpayers going public (general rate reduced by 3 percent).<br>Elimination of income tax on dividends from within the country.<br>Dividends and after-tax profits from overseas are not subject to income tax as long as they are invested in Indonesia.<br>Non-object to Income Tax on (a) Share of profit\/SHU of cooperatives, and (b) Hajj funds managed by BPKH.<br>Room for Adjustment of Income Tax Article 26 Rate on b<br>Investment in the form of assets (imbreng) is not payable to VAT.<br>The seven policies touch on income tax (PPh) and value-added tax and sales tax on luxury goods (PPN &amp; PPnBM) regulations. Let&#8217;s take a deep dive into these seven policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, the reduction of the Corporate Income Tax rate from 25 percent shows that the tax rate on income in our country is relatively high and less competitive with other neighboring countries. The average corporate income tax rates in various regions are the world (23%), Europe (21.77%), OECD (23.59%), ASEAN (23.35%), Asia (20.95%), and Africa (28.20%). This means that our country&#8217;s tax rate is higher than the average ASEAN country. Simply put, investors are looking for a lower tax rate as their investment destination. Therefore, it is only natural that the Corporate Income Tax rate is changed to below the average rate of ASEAN countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Second, the Corporate Income Tax rate for taxpayers listed in the national stock exchange market or going public has also decreased by 3 percent from the general rate. In 2021, the general rate is 22 percent, while the rate for taxpayers going public is only 19 percent, which will be only 17 percent in 2022. The reduction in the WP go public rate is likely to encourage domestic companies to immediately conduct an IPO (initial public offering). Being a publicly listed company means that it is much better qualified and trusted. It is considered more accountable because it uses a good financial and audit system so that the risk of fraud is small. The government does not need a big effort to monitor the compliance of taxpayers who have IPO (go public).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Third, the elimination of income tax on domestic dividends is also an effort to attract domestic and foreign investors because of course they expect dividends on their investment results. Dividends will not be subject to income tax if they come from within the country received by (a) Domestic Individual Taxpayers, as long as they are invested in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia within a certain period of time, and\/or (b) Domestic Corporate Taxpayers, are not subject to income tax (excluded from tax objects).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fourth, dividends originating from abroad and after-tax income from an offshore business unit are not subject to income tax in Indonesia, in the event that they are invested or used to support other business activities in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia within a certain period of time and originate from an offshore listed company or an offshore private company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, there are provisions for private companies abroad, namely (a) dividends invested in Indonesia, are not subject to income tax, (b) if invested below 30 percent of the profit after tax of the Foreign Business Entity, the difference from 30 percent minus the realization of investment in Indonesia (which is less than 30 percent), is subject to income tax; (c) the remaining profit after tax of the Foreign Business Entity after deducting a and b, is not subject to income tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fifth, exempted from the object of Income Tax are (1) the share of profit or the remaining results of operations received or obtained by members of cooperatives, limited liability companies whose capital is not divided into shares, partnerships, associations, firms, and partnerships, including unit holders of collective investment contracts; (2) deposit funds for Hajj Pilgrimage Fees (BPIH) and\/or special BPIH, and income from the development of Hajj finance in certain fields or financial instruments, received by the Hajj Financial Management Agency (BPKH) whose provisions are regulated by or based on the Minister of Finance Regulation; (3) surplus received\/obtained by social and religious bodies or institutions registered with the agency in charge, which is reinvested in the form of social and religious facilities and infrastructure within a maximum period of 4 (four) years from the acquisition of the surplus, or placed as an endowment fund, the provisions of which are further regulated by or based on a Minister of Finance Regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This new regulation indicates that the state provides very broad opportunities to communities, organizations or groups engaged in social and religious affairs. They will be more free to attract constituents and provide solutions to community problems because the government does not collect taxes on the income or surplus of their activities. And of course, cooperatives are also given further space to maneuver their business-especially into MSMEs-because the profit sharing received by members will not be taxed. This means that cooperatives can become leaders of MSMEs in channeling funds or independently managing their business units without worrying about the imposition of taxes on the profits they earn. In other words, the state wants to invite its people to dare to invest in cooperative legal entities, firms, CVs, and the like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>read also<\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__list wp-block-latest-posts\"><\/ul>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sixth, the reduction in the Income Tax Article 26 rate on interest, which has been at 20 percent, can be lowered by government regulation. The expansion of the object of interest is also added to include premiums, discounts and rewards in connection with guarantees of debt repayment. The 20 percent rate is certainly very high for this financial product <a href=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/customs-from-the-past-to-the-present\/\">investment sector<\/a>. If it is reduced to 15 or even lower, it will certainly be a breath of fresh air for investors. The domestic financial market will become more competitive and dare to compete with foreign financial markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Seventh, equity participation in the form of non-shares or in the form of assets\/assets is not subject to VAT in the context of merger, consolidation, division, split and business acquisition on the condition that the person who conducts and receives the transfer of assets\/assets is a PKP. This is also an attractive incentive for investors who do not have cash or other current assets but in the form of assets or assets to become their investment capital deposits without worrying about being subject to VAT of 10 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All of the above government policies in the taxation cluster for the purpose of increasing investment, both to attract domestic and foreign investors, are worth watching the results in 2021 and the years to come. However, that is with a note: after the issuance of technical instructions that can be used as a guide in the field for investors\/WPs and tax authorities in utilizing all these tax incentives and facilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government absorbed the aspirations of taxpayers to reduce tax administration costs to a lower level. Will taxpayer compliance increase because of it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous meeting we discussed how the Job Creation Law increases the amount of investment in the country through its taxation cluster. Now we continue with the second objective, which is to increase the voluntary compliance of taxpayers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the information submitted by the government in the Financial Note along with the 2020 Draft State Budget, the number of taxpayers in 2019 was recorded at 42 million. This number increased from the previous year (2018) of 38.7 million taxpayers. In 2015, 2016, and 2017, the number of taxpayers was recorded at 30 million, 32.8 million, and 36.0 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the 42 million NPWP recorded in the DGT administration system in 2019, 38.7 million of them are Individual NPWP. The remaining 3.3 million are Corporate NPWPs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The increase in the number of taxpayers was followed by the development of compliance in reporting notification letters (SPT). However, the movement of formal compliance is more volatile than the increase in the number of taxpayers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prior to the implementation of the tax amnesty policy, the tax return compliance ratio was 60.4 percent (2015) and 60.7 percent (2016). In 2017, there was a significant jump in the compliance ratio reaching 72.6 percent. However, in 2018, the compliance ratio dropped to 71.1 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government said that the improvement in the compliance ratio is a combination of an increase in taxpayers&#8217; voluntary compliance, changes in compliance behavior post-tax amnesty, and additional coverage of taxpayers in the tax administration system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2019, according to the government, the development of the compliance ratio is still positive at 72.9 percent. However, data from the Directorate General of Taxes shows that until the first semester of 2020 the number of taxpayers who have reported notification letters (SPT) is only 11.46 million or 60.34 percent of the target of 19 million taxpayers who report SPT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With this amount, it means that there are still 7.54 million taxpayers who have not submitted their annual obligations. Of course, the reason for the Covid-19 pandemic is something that greatly affects taxpayer compliance. The implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) has greatly reduced the interaction between taxpayers and tax officials, especially on the service side at all tax service offices in Indonesia. It makes sense and is very understandable, but it may also not be understandable considering that the entire service model for delivering taxpayer compliance has moved to technology-based services. Reports are made in real time through the DJPONLINE website and this has been massively socialized to taxpayers since 2017-2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, the decline in compliance in 2020 must be interpreted that there is something wrong in the socialization of technology-based tax obligation submission. The author sees that during the use of online services, there are still many taxpayers queuing at the Tax Office during the annual party for reporting tax obligations, both for OP taxpayers and Corporate Taxpayers. The Tax Office officers are often overwhelmed by the number of taxpayers who keep coming in waves to report their tax obligations, which ironically is done by opening DJPONLINE services at the Tax Office. Instead of reducing the burden of service at the tax office, this actually adds to the burden because officers must guide them properly and patiently. Not to mention that due to its annual nature, taxpayers often forget their DJPONLINE account password.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The tax authority must immediately make sure that the voluntary compliance of taxpayers, which fell in 2020, will increase again in 2021. So that there is no sense of pessimism with all of this, it is time for us to test the efficacy of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law in increasing taxpayers&#8217; voluntary compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two new regulations in articles 111, 112 and 113 of the Job Creation Law to increase taxpayers&#8217; voluntary compliance, namely (1) relaxation of input tax crediting rights (PM) for taxable entrepreneurs (PKP) and (2) rearrangement of tax administrative sanctions and interest rewards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The following is a resume of the above regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A. Regulations on PM before the PKP makes a VAT payable delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For Taxable Person for VAT Purposes who have not yet made delivery of Taxable Goods and\/or Services and\/or export of Taxable Goods and\/or Services, PM on the acquisition of Taxable Goods and\/or Services, import of Taxable Goods, and utilization of Intangible Goods and\/or Services from outside the Customs Area within the Customs Area may be credited to the extent that it meets the crediting provisions in accordance with this Law (may be credited on all acquisition of Taxable Goods and\/or Services that are directly related to the delivery of Taxable Goods and\/or Services),<br>Overpayment (LB) is compensated to the next period and can be restituted at the end of the financial year,<br>If the first three (3) years since crediting there has been no delivery of BKP\/JKP, VAT becomes non-creditable (canceled).<br>In the previous regulation, in VAT Law No. 42 of 2009 it was stated &#8220;For PKP that has not yet produced so that it has not made a taxable delivery, PM on the acquisition and \/ or import of capital goods can be credited (limited to capital goods)&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>B. Regulation of input tax (PM) that is not reported in the tax return and found during the audit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PM on the acquisition of taxable goods and\/or services, import of taxable goods, and utilization of intangible goods and\/or services from outside the Customs Area within the Customs Area that are not reported in the notified VAT Monthly Return and\/or found during an audit may be credited by the Taxable Person for VAT Purposes to the extent that they meet the crediting provisions in accordance with this Law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous regulation, in VAT Law No. 42 Year 2009, it was stated that &#8220;Input Tax (PM) not reported in the VAT Return &amp; found during the audit, cannot be credited&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>C. Input tax (PM) arrangement billed with tax assessment (SKP)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PM on the acquisition of Taxable Goods and\/or Services, import of Taxable Goods, and utilization of Intangible Goods and\/or Services from outside the Customs Area within the Customs Area that is collected by issuing a tax assessment may be credited by the Taxable Person for VAT Purposes amounting to the principal amount of VAT stated in the tax assessment provided that the tax assessment has been paid and no legal action has been taken and the crediting provisions in accordance with this Law are met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous regulation, in VAT Law No. 42 of 2009, it was stated that &#8220;Input Tax (PM) invoiced with a tax assessment cannot be credited&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>D. Setting the amount of administrative sanctions in the form of interest per month<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous regulation, in KUP Law No. 27 of 2008, it was stated &#8220;The amount of administrative sanctions in the form of interest per month at a flat rate of 2%&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>E. Setting the amount of administrative sanctions<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous regulation, in KUP Law No. 27 of 2008, it was stated: &#8220;The amount of administrative sanctions in the form of an increase of 50% of the underpaid tax&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now let&#8217;s look at an illustration of the change in the determination of the administrative sanction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>F. Sanctions for Taxable Person for VAT Purposes who are late in making Tax Invoice or not filling out Tax Invoice completely, in the form of fines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Against entrepreneurs or Taxable Entrepreneurs (PKP) as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Entrepreneurs who have been confirmed as PKP, but do not make tax invoices or make tax invoices late;<br>Entrepreneurs who have been confirmed as PKP who do not fill in the complete Tax Invoice as referred to in Article 13 paragraph (5) &amp; paragraph (6) of the 1984 VAT Law and its amendments, in addition to the identity of the buyer of BKP or JKP recipient as well as the name and signature as referred to in Article 13 paragraph (5) letter b &amp; letter g of the 1984 VAT Law and its amendments in the event that the delivery is made by PKP retail traders. respectively, in addition to being obliged to deposit tax;<br>each, in addition to being obliged to deposit the tax payable, is subject to administrative sanctions in the form of a fine of 1% of the Tax Imposition Base.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the previous regulation, in KUP Law No. 27 of 2008, it was stated &#8220;Sanctions for VAT Purposes that are late in making Tax Invoice or do not fill in the Tax Invoice completely, in the form of a fine of 2% of the Tax Imposition Base&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>G. Setting the amount of interest compensation<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the Overpaid Tax Assessment Letter is issued late as referred to in paragraph (2), the taxpayer shall be rewarded with interest at the interest rate per month determined by the Minister of Finance calculated from the expiration of the period as referred to in paragraph (2) until the issuance of the Overpaid Tax Assessment Letter.<br>In the previous regulation, in KUP Law No. 27 of 2008, it was stated &#8220;The amount of interest reward per month is given at a fixed rate of 2%&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From the results of the resume presentation of the articles of amendment to the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law, there are several important and interesting points that the author can express in the following analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, the government in improving compliance voluntarily targets Taxable Entrepreneurs, in this case having VAT and STLG obligations, to improve their tax compliance. For example, the late penalty for making tax invoices, which was originally 2 percent, became 1 percent. The government may realize that in business or economic activities, delays in invoicing are normal or commonplace due to things beyond the ability of PKP that &#8220;force&#8221; it to be late in issuing tax invoices. In my opinion, the government has absorbed the actual conditions of business with regulations that adjust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Second, the government also provides space for PKP to optimally utilize the input tax (PM) obtained from their partners or suppliers to compare with the output tax on the delivery of taxable goods\/services they perform. During this time, the complaint of PKP cannot use PM because it is considered not yet in production-which is allowed only to the extent of the use of capital goods. Now they can credit all PM related or directly related to company operations\/delivery of taxable goods or services. Interestingly, the overpayment that is compensated in the following period can be restituted at the end of the tax year is also part of the strategy to improve the compliance of PKP to be better in reporting its VAT Monthly Return and not to hesitate to ask for restitution to the state if there is an overpayment condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the author is still waiting whether this policy will be followed by a policy of accelerating audits for Taxable Person for VAT Purposes who experience overpayments and request restitution so that there is equalization of treatment for taxpayers and the tax authorities themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Third, the reduction in administrative sanction rates in the form of interest and the provision of interest rewards that have been using a flat\/fixed rate of 2 percent changed according to the banking\/financial benchmark interest rate shows sanctions that are increasingly friendly to the business world. The government absorbs the aspirations of taxpayers to reduce tax administration costs to a lower level. This is like a sharp knife prepared by DGT to make taxpayers have no more excuses for not settling tax bills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Is this regulation effective enough to boost taxpayers&#8217; voluntary compliance? Are taxpayers more compliant with the decrease in the amount of administrative sanctions?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the government has again extended fiscal or tax incentives for taxpayers who are directly or indirectly affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. This shows that all sectors of the economy have not shown significant activity. The business world is still experiencing a very deep contraction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We can see in the table below how the state is trying its best to hold back the pace of further economic contraction by increasing the state budget in the 2021 State Budget for the PEN (National Economic Recovery) program to reach more than IDR 600 trillion, which according to the author&#8217;s analysis this figure could still be higher in 2021-depending on the success of the vaccination program run by the government to contain the spread of Covid-19 infection in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PEN funds are used for five (5) most basic things or sectors, namely Health, Social Protection (through social assistance programs and others), Support for the MSME and corporate sectors, Business incentives and tax incentives and priority programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So it is not surprising that the tax incentives that have been applied from 2020 will be applied again in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And like the previous article which discusses the efficacy of the first and second parts of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law, in this third part, the author will discuss the purpose of the third Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law, namely &#8220;Providing or Increasing Legal Certainty&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The summary is as follows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is common that tax is the most feared and avoided policy by economic activists in this country as well as the most relied upon by the government in securing state revenue. Two very different sides, then how to take the middle way? So, one side must understand the wishes of the other side in order to reach a new understanding and agreement on the tax collection mechanism in this country. One way to make taxpayers not increasingly afraid or run away from taxes is to provide legal certainty for their tax obligations, both those that have been completed and those that have not. Let&#8217;s take it one by one and &#8220;test&#8221; whether this policy will have an effective impact on the psychology of taxpayers or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first is the provision regarding the change of domestic and foreign individual tax subjects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is something interesting about the changes in the rules regarding domestic and foreign tax subjects for the first person by adding the words Indonesian citizen and citizen in the domestic personal tax subject to emphasize that the state does not see a person&#8217;s citizenship status if the conditions are met as a domestic tax subject then it is determined as a domestic personal tax subject.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Do not forget that the status of a tax subject is not necessarily a WP if the objective element has not been fulfilled, namely income. The purpose of this addition is related to the next policy, namely tax imposition for foreigners residing in Indonesia only based on income received in Indonesia, namely using the domicile principle, while in the previous provision using the source principle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More interestingly, the criteria for foreigners who get this treatment must have &#8220;certain expertise and reside in Indonesia for at least four (4) tax years&#8221;. This means that our country has prepared for the arrival of foreign experts. Will this be good for the climate of competition in the business world, especially professions in this country?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The author is limited to discussing foreign workers with domestic workers due to this regulation, but what the author wants to underline is the different treatment for Indonesian citizens who enter as foreign individual tax subjects still using the source principle in the imposition of tax, meaning that the income they (Indonesian citizens) receive abroad must also be calculated with the income they receive domestically. The author is worried that this will raise the issue of unfair business treatment in this country. The policy of equal tax treatment (level playing field) in the application of VAT for PMSE or Trading Through Electronic Systems imposed on foreign service providers becomes unfair when talking about the culprit is an individual tax subject. Not to mention that what looks like not even providing legal certainty is the embedding of certain skills for foreign workers in this country which is very subjective and can change according to the taste of the government. Still, we have to wait for the derivative of this law in the finance minister&#8217;s regulation whether the &#8220;certain expertise&#8221; is determined based on a comprehensive study or is an &#8220;order&#8221; from other parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Consignment<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Next, legal certainty is to be obtained from the inclusion of coal as a VAT object and the delivery of taxable goods on consignment is not included in the VAT object. (Batu b<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In consignment there is also no element of transferring control over the goods to another party. This means that all risks to the goods, both physical and ownership, remain with the consignor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Previously, the provisions of Article 1A paragraph (1) letter g of the VAT Law stated that the delivery of taxable goods on consignment is included in the definition of the delivery of taxable goods that are subject to VAT. The explanatory memorandum of the VAT Law only explains that in the consignment, the VAT that has been paid when depositing the taxable goods can be credited with the output tax during the tax period in which the consigned taxable goods are delivered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the event that the consigned taxable goods are not sold or returned, the seller who receives the consignment may make a return receipt for the return. This provision applies as the juridical basis for the imposition of VAT on the delivery of taxable goods on consignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It turns out that the formulation of consignment as a taxable delivery has only existed since January 1, 1995, that is, since the enactment of the first amendment to the 1984 VAT Law. This means that during the previous 10 years, there were no provisions governing the imposition of VAT on this consignment transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition, the explanation in the VAT Law is also not a substantial explanation of the reason why consignment is taxed. Instead, it is only a technical explanation of the tax administration aspect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It appears that the VAT Law prioritizes the principle of revenue optimization in determining consignment transactions as the delivery of taxable goods. Where entrepreneurs who entrust goods to other parties are considered to have the intention to sell the goods. In fact, when the owner leaves the goods does not mean that the sale has occurred. This provision adds to the administrative burden for the party who entrusts the goods because it must collect VAT and issue tax invoices, report them in the VAT period notification letter, and must deposit VAT if there is an underpayment in the tax report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The policy is also not in line with the principle of ease of administration in tax collection theory. The VAT Law only takes the practical side by imposing VAT upfront on the delivery of consigned goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If it turns out that the goods are not sold and returned, the VAT that has been collected can be requested back by issuing a return note. This treatment certainly ignores the fairness aspect from the entrepreneur&#8217;s side, and is not in accordance with the accrual principle in generally accepted accounting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From an income tax (PPh) perspective, consignments are not recorded as sales that become tax objects. Income (turnover) is only recorded if the goods have actually been sold. So, in this case the accounting principle is in line with the principle of recognition of property rights in Income Tax on consignment goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, the elimination of consignment from the definition of delivery of taxable goods by the Job Creation Law has returned the VAT regulation to its pre-1995 condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After all, for the purpose of state revenue, there are still other business sectors and types of transactions that have more potential to generate taxes than this consignment transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tax regulations should still prioritize the principle of equity in tax collection. In consignment transactions, the government should just be patient for a while, after all, if there has been a sale, the tax will eventually go to the state treasury as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The elimination of the provision of consignment goods from the group of taxable supplies that are subject to VAT should indeed be done. This is because, in addition to academic defects, including consignment as a VAT payable delivery only benefits the government in terms of tax revenue and pays less attention to the side of justice for the community. Revoking the provision of consignment as a delivery of VAT-paid taxable goods means returning the VAT regulation to the pre-1995 period, which basically had no crucial issues in tax revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The next thing regarding the relaxation of VAT provisions is the crediting of VAT input tax. Relaxation in terms of VAT input tax crediting will indirectly help realize respect for the rights of taxpayers. Interestingly, by IMF and OECD (2017), respect for taxpayers&#8217; rights also encourages legal certainty and increases investment. And in the author&#8217;s opinion, as explained in the second section, the return of non-creditable input tax to creditable is a breath of fresh air for the business world in this country. It shows the government&#8217;s assurance that their rights will be fulfilled in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lastly, talking about legal certainty is certainly talking about the tax sanctions in it, be it administrative sanctions or criminal tax sanctions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By stipulating the expiration of Tax Collection Letter (STP) to five (5) years-while the previous regulation was not regulated-affirms that the government will not attempt to continue collecting tax receivables from taxpayers whose collection period has expired, either because the amount is insignificant, or because there are tax administration problems or other reasons, the STP is declared legally void.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The issuance of STP to collect back interest compensation that should not be given to taxpayers, to provide legal certainty and administrative convenience for the collection of interest compensation that should not be given to taxpayers whose arrangements have not been clear so far.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Likewise, the regulation regarding tax crimes that have been decided to be permanent can be issued a DIHAPUS tax assessment letter according to the author also greatly provides legal certainty for tax criminals. It is not intended to defend or justify a mistake, but to educate taxpayers who have made mistakes and admit their mistakes not to repeat those mistakes in the future by not adding more sanctions to it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The application of this one type of sanction also has a positive effect that the state is not &#8220;chaotic&#8221; by continuing to impose tax administration sanctions on taxpayers. Besides being good for educating, it is also good for simplifying the tax administration system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The last two things above are as if the government wants to state that tax is no longer a frightening figure for taxpayers and the community with its criminal sanctions, but a figure that is more humane and prioritizes a persuasive approach in collecting taxes from taxpayers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By the time I finished this paper, the minister of finance&#8217;s regulation on the implementation of the Job Creation Law No. 11 of 2020 had been issued. Therefore, the author will more or less touch on the technical guidelines for the implementation of the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this last section, the author will discuss the fourth objective of the enactment of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law, namely Creating a Fair Domestic Business Climate, which will be achieved through (1) taxation of electronic transactions and (2) inclusion of the NIK of buyers who do not have NPWP when making Tax Invoice by Taxable Entrepreneurs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We have understood together that so far there have been rules of the game regarding Trading Through Electronic Systems (PMSE), namely in PMK No. 48 \/ PMK.03 \/ 2020 concerning Procedures for Appointing Collectors, Collecting, and Depositing, and Reporting Value Added Tax on the Utilization of Intangible Taxable Goods and \/ or Taxable Services from Outside the Customs Area in the Customs Area through Trading Through Electronic Systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In its official statement, our country&#8217;s tax authority, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT), explained that the collection, deposit, and reporting of taxes on digital products will be carried out directly by digital companies or business actors Trading Through Electronic Systems (PMSE). In addition, it can also be through representatives in Indonesia appointed by the minister of finance (Menkeu) through the director general of tax (DGT).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Digital companies that meet the criteria for transaction value or a certain amount of traffic within 12 months will be appointed by the Minister of Finance through the Director General of Taxes as VAT collectors. Meanwhile, business actors who have met the criteria but have not been appointed as VAT collectors can submit online notifications to the DGT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DGT said that VAT collection on the utilization of digital products from abroad is part of the government&#8217;s efforts to create a level playing field for all business actors, especially between domestic and foreign business actors, as well as between conventional businesses and digital businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the enactment of this provision, digital products such as music streaming subscriptions, movie streaming, digital applications and games, and online services from abroad will be treated the same as various conventional products consumed by the public on a daily basis that have been subject to VAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VAT collection on the utilization of digital products from abroad is part of the government&#8217;s efforts to create a level playing field for all business actors, especially between domestic and foreign business actors, as well as between conventional businesses and digital businesses. Of course, this is interesting-because in accordance with the chosen title or theme of the article-there should be a comparison with the implementation of digital service tax in other countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comparison<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Citing the official website of tax consultant KPMG, Austria sets a digital tax of 5 percent on the turnover of advertising services provided by service providers there starting last January 1. Monthly digital tax payments are made on the 15th day of the second month after the subject month. For example, digital tax payments for January 2020 will be due in mid-March 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Digital service providers subject to the tax are groups of companies that have a turnover of 750 million euros globally and a turnover from digital advertising services of 25 million euros from a subsidiary in Austria. However, any company can qualify as a digital tax subject.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another rule is that companies that do not have a permanent establishment in the European Union must appoint an Austrian fiscal representative for digital tax purposes. Meanwhile, those with a permanent establishment in the European Union can appoint a fiscal representative or use online services from the tax authority to return taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, the Spanish government starting February 18 has approved the collection of a digital tax of 3 percent. In general, this rule stipulates that the tax subject is a digital service provider that obtains revenue from users in Spain. This leads to the establishment of a VAT for every digital transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The specific criteria for service providers to be subject to the tax is to have revenues of 750 million euros globally and revenues of 3 million euros in Spain. In addition, they are classified as digital advertising providers, data service providers, and digital interface meeting intermediary service providers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similar to Spain, France sets a digital services tax of 3 percent. However, the country led by President Emmanuel Macron set it first, starting January 1, 2019. The tax will be imposed on intermediary service providers and digital advertising service providers. Exempted are digital content service providers, communication services, and payment services that qualify under Article 314-1 of French monetary regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This tax is levied on both domestic and foreign companies that benefit from French users. The specific criteria are those with a turnover of 750 million euros globally and a turnover of 25 million euros in France. At least 30 multinational digital companies are affected by this policy, with 17 of them based in the US.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not alone<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, Indonesia is not alone in implementing the VAT regulation on digital services, after all, the application of this VAT will not violate international consensus, namely concerns about the application of double taxation because VAT is a tax on consumption applied to the end user (Principle Destination). It is also not discriminatory and the transaction is cross-jurisdictional, where the country where the goods or services are consumed has the right to collect VAT. Thus, the Job Creation Law No. 11 of 2020 Taxation Cluster is very appropriate to strengthen the previous regulation in this PMK No. 48.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lastly, it creates fairness in the domestic business climate by giving the right to taxpayers who have not yet become PKP and have obtained a Tax Invoice Input from their counterparty to be able to credit it when they are confirmed as PKP, which was not allowed in the previous regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Well, one of the ways that taxpayers can take advantage of this facility when making transactions is by stating the NIK or Population Identification Number for Individual Taxpayers, so that they can utilize the tax invoice they receive from their counterparty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And other rules also change the PKP of retail traders by adding a retail trade clause through an electronic system so that later sellers in the marketplace or who use the e-commerce platform are treated as retail traders who can collect VAT without having to make a complete tax invoice using an electronic tax invoice (e-Faktur).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, the discussion on the efficacy test of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law is complete. However, of course, we are still waiting for the technical implementation in the field whether it is really effective or just a lip-service.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>pro-visioner.com &#8211; Testing the Efficacy of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Law , The controversy over the Job Creation Bill, which people call the omnibus law, is over. The drama behind the passing of this law has become its own color. Pros and cons have emerged from experts in law, economics, state administration, and other [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":282,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pajak"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":637,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions\/637"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}