{"id":275,"date":"2025-04-05T08:00:59","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T01:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/?p=275"},"modified":"2025-04-05T08:00:59","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T01:00:59","slug":"ppn-and-its-origins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/ppn-and-its-origins\/","title":{"rendered":"PPN and its Origins"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\">pro-visioner.com <\/a>&#8211; PPN and its Origins , In the midst of the excitement over the issue of VAT on groceries, how about we explore the history of the birth of VAT in Indonesia?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The public was shocked by the news of the government&#8217;s plan to increase the VAT rate and expand the VAT tax object, from a single rate of 10 percent planned to be 12 percent proportionally. What is no less exciting is the imposition of the object of Taxable Goods (BKP), which was originally not subject to be subjected, for example on basic food (nine staples), one of which is rice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Likewise, in the object of Taxable Services (JKP), there are several types of services that were originally included in the negative list (not subject to VAT) to be subject to VAT such as Education Services and Health Services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taxes are indeed &#8220;sexy&#8221; to be fried by the mass media and on social media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>History of VAT<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It would be like eating sour vegetables without salt if the author only explains the history of VAT in Indonesia without first explaining how the world applies this VAT regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quoted on the DDTC (Danny Darussalam Tax Center) website, VAT is a relatively new type of tax and is considered a modern form of taxation (Liam Ebrill, 2001). Historically, VAT is a recent fiscal innovation. In fact, Sijbern Cnossen claims that the universal introduction of VAT can be considered the most important event in the evolution of tax structures that occurred in the last half of the 20th century (Kathryn James, 2015).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prior to the introduction of VAT, indirect consumption taxation was limited to certain products. For example, the imposition of excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco. In addition to excise taxes, other types of indirect taxes are also known, namely sales tax and circulation tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the distortions generated from sales tax and circulation tax due to the cascading effect of the application of these two types of taxes, coupled with the demand for increased revenue, have encouraged the government to look for alternative forms of taxation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"614\" src=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PPN-1024x614.jpg\" alt=\"PPN\" class=\"wp-image-276\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PPN-1024x614.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PPN-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PPN-768x461.jpg 768w, https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PPN.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">PPN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The basic idea of VAT first emerged from a German businessman named Dr. Wilhelm von Siemens who realized the problems caused by the application of circulation tax. In the 1920s, through his writings, von Siemens then developed his idea, which he called &#8220;circulation tax improvement&#8221; or &#8220;circulation tax refinement&#8221; (Alan Schenk and Oliver Oldman, 2007).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Besides von Siemens, the initial concept of VAT was also proposed by Thomas S. Adams in 1921 in the United States. The concept explained by Adams at that time was about how to reduce taxes on sales with taxes that had previously been paid on purchases of goods and\/or services related to business activities carried out as an effort to avoid the cascading effect. This concept is now known as the method of crediting input VAT against output tax (invoice-credit method).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ideas and concepts that emerged in the 1920s eventually led to the conclusion that a tax that is an &#8220;improved circulation tax&#8221; is a tax imposed and collected at each stage of production and distribution of goods and services at the time of the transaction. However, although imposed at each stage of production and distribution, with the method of crediting input tax against output tax, the tax imposed is only on the value added arising at each stage. This idea and concept is the origin of VAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VAT was first implemented in France in 1948 in the form of taxation at the manufacturing stage. In 1954, France then changed the imposition of VAT from only at the manufacturing stage to taxation at all stages of production and distribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many European countries enacted VAT in the 1960s and 1970s. Meanwhile, developing countries followed suit in the 1980s and later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In practice, most governments apply VAT as a replacement for sales tax, which was previously applied as a form of tax on consumption. European countries, for example, have widely used VAT to reduce or eliminate the application of sales tax (Sijbren Cnossen, 1998).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In less than half a century, VAT has become one of the most dominant revenue instruments in various countries. VAT is also considered as a type of tax that has developed very rapidly compared to other types of taxes around the world (Kathryn James, 2015).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As of January 1, 2016, according to OECD (2016), there are 167 countries in the world that have implemented VAT as a form of tax on consumption in their countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about in Indonesia?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Development Tax Period I (PPb I)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Slamet Soelarno, in his book Pajak Pembangunan I, published by Saung Indah in 1973, it can be said that the development of tax collection on consumption in Indonesia began with the enactment of Pajak Pembangunan I (PPb I). PPb I is one of the taxes levied by the central government based on Law Number 14 of 1947 concerning the Collection of Development Tax in Restaurants and Lodging Houses (PPb I Law of 1947).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This tax began to be levied officially on June 1, 1947 on all payments in restaurants and lodging houses amounting to 10 percent of the payment amount. Payment here refers to the purchase of food and beverages or the rental of a room, as well as any extras such as staff, electricity, water, and so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Restaurants usually frequented by people belonging to the poorer sections of the population were exempted from <a href=\"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/this-country-depends-on-taxes\/\">this payment<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PPb I adheres to the self-assessment system, which encourages taxpayers to calculate, collect, remit, pay, and report their own taxes based on the awareness of taxpayers. This self-assessment system is realized in the form of a contante depositing system (cash deposit system).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the development of Indonesia&#8217;s post-Independence situation, the PPb I Law also underwent changes in accordance with the needs of that time. This development is evidenced by the amendments and additions to the 1947 PPb I Law through Law Number 20 of 1948 concerning Making Amendments and Additions to Law Number 14 of 1947 of the Development Tax I (PPb I Law of 1948).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>read also <\/p>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__list wp-block-latest-posts\"><\/ul>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the preamble, it is stated that the amendment of Law I of 1947 was due to the difficulties that arose in implementing Law I of 1947 and the absence of articles on tax collection by force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then, with the issuance of Law Number 32 of 1956 concerning the Balance of State Finances with Regions, which have the Right to Manage Their Own Households, PPb I, which was originally a state tax, was declared a regional tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The change of PPb I from a state tax to a regional tax is an implementation of the implementation of the widest possible autonomy in the regions to manage their own finances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, the PPb I Law is levied by the regions themselves if the regions are ready to collect it. Because each region has its own local regulations, the implementation of the collection of PPb I as a local tax can vary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For example, in Jakarta, PPb I is levied at a rate of 5 percent and the target, which was initially only restaurants, has expanded to lodging houses and catering services. Similarly, the taxpayers are determined based on certain criteria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the explanation above, it can be seen that PPb I is a type of tax on the consumption of goods and services that is limited in nature because it is only imposed on the delivery of food and beverage items in restaurants, cafeterias, coffee shops or limited to services provided in lodging houses, such as room rentals in hotels, inns, and other lodging houses, excluding lodging houses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, not all consumption of goods and services is the object of PPb I. However, despite its limited nature, PPb I can still be considered as the beginning of the development of tax on consumption in Indonesia, which is the predecessor of VAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Circulation Tax 1950 (PPe 1950)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to PPb I, a form of tax on consumption that has been in effect in Indonesia is Pajak Peredaran. In Dutch, the circulation tax (PPe) is called omzetblasting. Meanwhile, in English, this tax is called turnover tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Indonesia, PPe is the beginning of tax collection on the use of public goods and is a complement to PPb I which was previously applicable. The legal basis for the collection of PPe in Indonesia is Emergency Law Number 12 of 1950 on Turnover Tax (PPe Law), which was enacted on February 13, 1950 and promulgated on March 18, 1950. Therefore, this tax is known as PPe 1950.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PPe is a usage tax that covers almost all goods that are used or used up in Indonesia. Therefore, what is taxed is the delivery of goods in free circulation. The rate of PPe imposed is 2 percent on every delivery of goods. Meanwhile, the tax base (DPP) is the price of goods (Rochmat Soemitro, 1990).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to being imposed on goods, PPe is also imposed on services, namely all actions other than the delivery of movable goods and fixed goods, which are carried out with reimbursement. Reimbursement here is intended as a value in the form of money that must be paid to the person who performs the service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The PPe recognizes two different ways of imposing tax. The first method is a lump sum collection so that the PPe is only imposed once on the final result. This collection can be done at the beginning of the production line, that is, at the time of delivery by the producer or manufacturer or at one of the subsequent links in the chain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, the second method is to collect tax every time there is a transfer of the goods concerned to the next level. This collection system is known as a multilevel collection system or multiple times at all levels of circulation of goods in the production and distribution channels. At each delivery of the goods, no adjustment or deduction is made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since it is levied multiple times and without any deduction at each lane, there is an addition to the calculation of the cost of goods. This makes the tax burden double, exceeding the rate actually applicable to the circulation of these goods. It is this burden that must ultimately be borne by the consumer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For these reasons, the business community and parliament at that time objected to the application of the PPe, which was considered to cause serious economic distortions or irregularities and did not support justice. Therefore, on October 1, 1951, the PPe Law was withdrawn and declared expired after the law had been in effect for nine months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sales Tax<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Emergency Law No. 19\/19\/1951 on the Collection of Sales Tax (PPn Law) as the legal basis for the collection of sales tax known as Sales Tax 1951 (PPn).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The PPn Law came into force on October 1, 1951. PPn is nothing but a replacement for the PPe that had been in effect previously. VAT is levied on the sales price of goods that are not the daily necessities of life. Those not subject to VAT include rice, corn, salt, coconut oil, sugar, kerosene, beans, soybeans, salted fish, vegetables, and so on (Suwito Ardiyanto, 1981).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to VAT on the delivery of goods, VAT is also levied on the delivery of services. However, not all services are subject to VAT. There are 18 types of services defined by the VAT Law as taxable services, such as notary services, accountant services, advocate services, brokers, commissioners, and so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taxpayers on VAT are entrepreneurs (producers) or importers of goods that are not the daily necessities of life. Producers or importers of these goods are responsible for the imposition of VAT (Rochmat Soemitro, 1990).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VAT is a tax with a one-time collection system at the manufacturer level, namely at the time of delivery of goods. However, there is a provision in Article 31 of the VAT Law which stipulates that if the goods are reprocessed by the next manufacturer, the VAT on the delivery of the reprocessed goods can be deducted with the previously paid VAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The article also regulates the deduction of input tax levied on the price of goods entered and used in the customs territory of Indonesia. Thus, the VAT Law regulates the collection of VAT and Input Tax, in addition to collecting Luxury Tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This VAT Law has undergone many expansion changes related to tax subjects, tax objects, and rates. Initially, only the manufacturer was the tax subject. However, after January 1, 1960, the tax object was expanded to include service entrepreneurs as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The tax rate also changed, from a general rate of 10 percent to 20 percent. In addition, the special rate on luxury goods, which was originally 20 percent, changed to 50 percent (Government Regulation in Lieu of Law in 1995).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, based on the Decree of the Minister of Finance Number 486 of 1974, the VAT rate was again changed by dividing the VAT rate into three (3) groups as follows (Suwito Ardiyanto, 1981):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0 percent, which is for goods that are exempt from VAT, such as daily necessities and newspapers.<br>5 percent, for example for goods in the form of cardboard, wrapping paper, writing paper, printing paper, carbon, and others.<br>10 percent, which applies to goods that are not included in a and b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Please note, the VAT system also gives producers and importers the right to demand back the tax they have paid from buyers or consumers. This is done by increasing the price of all goods produced by the producer or imported by 3 percent of the actual price. So, in essence, in the VAT system, it is the buyer or consumer who bears the burden of VAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In subsequent developments, Article 31 of the VAT Law, which allows the calculation and provision of refunds of taxes paid, was abolished. This elimination is because the provisions in Article 31 of the VAT Law are often misused by taxpayers to avoid the tax that must be paid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, as it turns out, the abolition of Article 31 of the VAT Law is considered to cause tax collection on tax because VAT, which was previously imposed when goods were produced, is included as one of the components of the selling price of goods. As a result, when the goods are produced and handed over to the next party, VAT will be imposed once again on the price of the goods, which includes VAT (Rochmat Soemitro, 1990).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another weakness of the VAT system is the difficulty of supervision. It is relatively easy to be misappropriated. For example, sellers do not deposit the tax correctly. VAT has no means to scrutinize the accuracy of taxpayers&#8217; reports and bookkeeping (Surabaya Post Team, 1986).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The enactment of VAT-together with the implementation of the &#8220;self-assessment system&#8221;-is one of the important milestones in the history of tax reform in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In an effort to adapt to the times, the VAT Law has been amended and supplemented several times. However, only in a patchwork manner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, all of these changes and additions are basically intended to eliminate the negative side of the current VAT system, namely eliminating the cascading effect of VAT implementation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, there has been a trend of implementing consumption tax under the VAT system by both industrialized and developing countries over the past twenty years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tax Reform<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, the government concluded that in order to achieve the desired development needs, such as increasing state revenue, encouraging exports, and equalizing the tax burden, the VAT system needs to be replaced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The VAT Law was deemed unusable to fulfill these needs and was replaced with the VAT system stipulated in Law Number 8 Year 1983 concerning Value Added Tax on Goods and Services and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods (VAT Law Number 8 Year 1983).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, seen from a broader perspective, the replacement of VAT to VAT is actually part of the second tax reform (after the 1970 tax reform). This is because, in this 1983 tax reform, in addition to changes to VAT, the principle of self-assessment in calculating Income Tax was also introduced (Fuad Bawazier, 2011).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The amendment to the VAT in 1983 was a comprehensive and fundamental change to the VAT Law. The reason is that the VAT Law is considered no longer possible to meet the needs or accommodate the growing economic activities of the community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This reason is stated in the General Section of the Explanation of VAT Law Number 8 Year 1983 as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The current taxation system, especially the 1951 Sales Tax, is no longer adequate to accommodate the activities of the community and has not yet reached the target of development needs, among others, to increase State revenues, encourage exports, and equalize taxation.&#8221; (Bold of the author.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In its implementation, VAT Law No. 8 of 1983 was further regulated in Government Regulation No. 38 of 1983 which was initially to be enacted on July 1, 1984. However, through Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 Year 1984 (Perppu), the government decided to suspend the implementation of VAT Law Number 8 Year 1983 to no later than January 1, 1986.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The suspension of the validity period of VAT Law No. 8\/1983, according to the explanation of this Perppu, is due to the unpreparedness of various parties concerned to implement the law starting July 1, 1984. This postponement is carried out because it is feared that the unpreparedness could cause disturbances that could harm the state and the community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nevertheless, the implementation of the VAT Law, which had been postponed until January 1, 1986 at the latest, came into effect on April 1, 1985. The provisions are regulated in Government Regulation No. 22 of 1985 as a replacement for Government Regulation No. 38 of 1983 (Soerjono Sastrohadikoesoemo, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the beginning of its implementation, VAT Law Number 8 Year 1983 only directly regulates the first sale of Taxable Goods (BKP). Further transactions, from distributors to subdistributors and further to consumers, the imposition of VAT is regulated by Government Regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similarly, the types of services subject to VAT are also regulated by Government Regulation (Soerjono Sastrohadikoesoemo, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Law Number 8 Year 1983 has been amended four times in a period of more than 40 years or four decades, namely:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first amendment took effect on January 1, 1995, with Law Number 11 of 1994, Article 1 through Article 17 of Law Number 8 of 1983 was amended.<br>The second amendment came into effect on January 1, 2001, with Law Number 18 of 2000, Article 1 to Article 16C was amended.<br>The third amendment was made by Law Number 42 of 2009 (VAT Law Number 42 of 2009), effective April 1, 2010.<br>The fourth amendment was made to Law Number 11 of 2020 Taxation Cluster or known as the Job Creation Law (omnibus law) came into force on November 2, 2020.<br>Law No. 8 of 1983 was enacted to replace Emergency Law No. 19 of 1951 in conjunction with Law No. 35 of 1953 on Sales Tax called the 1951 Sales Tax Law (PPn).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sales Tax (PPn) was replaced with Value Added Tax (VAT) because VAT has several positive legal characteristics that Sales Tax does not have. For one, it does not have a cumulative impact despite being a multistage levy. In addition, both Sales Tax and Value Added Tax are characterized as Indirect Taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since April 1, 1985, Law Number 8 Year 1983 on Value Added Tax on Goods and Services and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods came into effect, which underwent several amendments as mentioned above. However, the name of this Law has not changed but is still called the 1984 Value Added Tax Law as stipulated in Article 20 of Law Number 8 of 1983.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It should be understood that the legal character of VAT as a tax on consumption that distinguishes it from Income Tax as a tax on business activities makes VAT also known as an objective tax. This means that in VAT, the tax object occupies a strategic position. The determination of the tax object is crucial and has a very broad impact because that is the nature of VAT. Therefore, a comprehensive study needs to be conducted before new objects in VAT are added or excluded, imposed or not imposed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The House of Representatives as a policy maker (regulator) together with the government that implements the policy (operator) must open themselves as widely as possible to the public, listening to many inputs and suggestions from various parties so as not to cause negative impacts when a new policy (related to VAT) is enacted. In prudence there will be safety and in haste there will be regret.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>pro-visioner.com &#8211; PPN and its Origins , In the midst of the excitement over the issue of VAT on groceries, how about we explore the history of the birth of VAT in Indonesia? The public was shocked by the news of the government&#8217;s plan to increase the VAT rate and expand the VAT tax object, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":276,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pajak"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":639,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275\/revisions\/639"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pro-visioner.com\/pvk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}